PHI Data-Flow Architecture
An end-to-end map of where PHI is collected, processed, stored, and deleted, including retries, exceptions, support access, and backups.
Is your application ready to handle PHI?We build healthcare LLM applications around the path protected health information takes: what the model sees, where it is stored, who can access it, and how the system behaves when the evidence is missing.
A business associate agreement with a model provider is an important contractual boundary, but it does not secure the application around it. PHI can still leak through prompts, retrieved documents, logs, traces, caches, support tooling, and tool calls.
We engineer healthcare LLM systems so each of those paths is deliberate: minimized data, server-side permissions, controlled retention, and evaluation that shows how the system behaves before real patients and clinicians depend on it.

Intake forms, EHR or partner integrations, prompt assembly, retrieval, model inputs and outputs, vector indexes, logs, exports, and backups all belong on the map. That inventory drives the architecture, the vendor review, and the controls that come next.
We choose the simplest architecture that meets the clinical or operational need, then engineer the privacy, security, and evaluation work around it.
An end-to-end map of where PHI is collected, processed, stored, and deleted, including retries, exceptions, support access, and backups.
Is your application ready to handle PHI?Workflows that send the model only the information a task needs, using de-identified or synthetic data wherever it is sufficient.
Deployment on managed model services covered by a provider BAA, or self-hosted models in a cloud account you control, chosen per workflow.
Retrieval over policies, guidelines, and records with server-side permission checks, so answers are traceable and users only see what they are allowed to.
How we evaluate RAG retrieval qualityAuthentication, least-privilege access, encryption, and audit trails across the application, model calls, and supporting services.
Tests for accuracy, missing-evidence behavior, prompt injection, cross-patient leakage, and unsafe tool use, run before launch and after changes.
We helped a correctional technology company bring an AI-powered safety monitoring platform to production, including HIPAA-focused security, architecture, and remediation work, alongside AI and computer vision workflows and deployment support.
See the work we have deliveredSoftware Sushi follows HIPAA-compliant development practices for PHI across our healthcare AI and data work. That engineering support is designed to help clients meet their own HIPAA compliance obligations.
It is not a legal opinion or a certification. We work alongside your privacy, security, and legal stakeholders, and we document the decisions and evidence they need to review.
Can we send PHI to an LLM? Read the frameworkMap the workflow and the PHI path, review vendors and infrastructure boundaries, and turn open risks into a prioritized plan.
Learn how our consulting worksValidate the approach with synthetic or de-identified data first, so feasibility is established before real PHI enters the system.
How our AI proof of concept service worksImplement the application, retrieval, permissions, logging boundaries, and evaluation as one tested system.
Go live with documented controls, then monitor quality, access, and changes, with clear ownership for reviews and incidents.
Clear answers on scope, architecture, data, and delivery.
It can be, but only when the complete workflow is controlled. A signed BAA with the model provider is one part of the decision. You also need to understand where prompts, outputs, retrieved documents, logs, and backups persist, who can access them, and how the application behaves under missing evidence or hostile inputs.
Yes. We follow HIPAA-compliant development practices to protect PHI across our healthcare AI and data processing work. HIPAA compliance is a distinct practice for us, not a team certification or a platform partnership.
That depends on the provider agreement, the specific service and configuration, and your own requirements. Options include managed model services offered under a BAA and self-hosted open models in an environment you control. We confirm what the actual contract and configuration cover rather than assuming.
Not always. A self-hosted model can simplify some data boundaries but adds operational responsibility. We compare managed and self-hosted options against your data, risk, latency, and cost requirements before recommending one.
Yes. Where de-identified or synthetic data is sufficient, we design the workflow around it, and we use it for early proofs of concept before real PHI is involved.
No. Our engineering work supports your HIPAA compliance obligations, but it is not legal advice or a certification. Qualified privacy and legal counsel should review the decisions before production use.
Tell us the workflow, the data involved, and the users who depend on it. We will help you map the PHI path and the responsible next step.